7 Comments
User's avatar
Kevin D. Gomez's avatar

Great Post!

Expand full comment
Brian Albrecht's avatar

Thanks :)

Expand full comment
mike's avatar

also, further explanation of the nordhaustt 2% value capture would be fascinating...have read that stat multiple times, but never seen great explanation. Although is has massive implications, any place that you or others explore that would be fascinating!

Expand full comment
Diomides Mavroyiannis's avatar

Hm... why are consumers better off? It seems like they would be worse off. It's simply that their surplus gets turned into profit...

Expand full comment
Brian Albrecht's avatar

The consumers can be better off or worse off. That’s true. But consider the case where there is a fixed cost and the good won’t be produced without price discrimination. Then clearly the consumers are better off under price discrimination since their surplus goes from zero to the two green rectangles.

Expand full comment
mike's avatar

this is a critical distinction. If price discrimination is needed to make the item /serve profitable at all, then you are correct consumer benefits. but in MANY cases where the product will be made anyway, price discrimination and manipulative market power / concentration shafts the consumer. maybe not a 101 model, but any models that accurately bifurcate this situation?

Expand full comment
Jason's avatar

Okay, I'm late here, but surely it's only the consumers with high WTP that are shafted -- the rest are better off?

Expand full comment