No matter how you slice it, for a good long while you will need highly skilled experts in those domains most affected by GPTs to be able to determine when the GPT gives a good answer or complete nonsense. Beware of the AI doomers who are convinced all software engineers will be unemployed in 5-10 years. But, also, be wary of AI polly-annas who see the rise of AI as purely wonderful. Neither of those extremes are going to be correct.
I'm just not qualified to try to read this. My CPA (1973) is just too old.
GPT? (OK, I looked that one up.) Very interesting. ALL tools require/reward peculiar skills. Ever watch an under-40 keyboard with their thumbs on a smart phone?
No matter how you slice it, for a good long while you will need highly skilled experts in those domains most affected by GPTs to be able to determine when the GPT gives a good answer or complete nonsense. Beware of the AI doomers who are convinced all software engineers will be unemployed in 5-10 years. But, also, be wary of AI polly-annas who see the rise of AI as purely wonderful. Neither of those extremes are going to be correct.
Made me think differently. thank you
Isn't there a historical analogy (steam power, computers, machines) that could be comparable to the rise of AI?
"That’s the demand side for abor"?
I'm just not qualified to try to read this. My CPA (1973) is just too old.
GPT? (OK, I looked that one up.) Very interesting. ALL tools require/reward peculiar skills. Ever watch an under-40 keyboard with their thumbs on a smart phone?